Solar Technologies Will Prevail!!
Energy is a huge topic that’s currently being debated on
what is the best route to take. Some people want to implement solar panels and photovoltaic
devices, while others currently still want to use non-renewable sources such as
fossil fuels. Non-renewable sources are limited, while the sun is free and is
not limited. Some political leaders are against the implementation of solar
panels and Photovoltaic devices because the manufacturing process is too expensive.
Politicians sometimes only focus on if they are making profits, and sometimes forget
the other important things. Scientist agree that solar technologies are
expensive in the beginning, but in the long run they would save a great amount of
money. Also solar devices are the best choice for people, the environment and
the economy. They don’t release any pollution, which means if won’t affect
anybody’s health and the manufacturing process creates jobs. This is an example
of why scientist and politicians sometimes cannot coexist because each side’s
priorities are different.
Currently in places like Arizona, Hawaii, California and
Colorado there are huge debates on what the future should be regarding the
process of energy creation. In Arizona some political leaders are fighting to
implement a so called “Solar Tax” of 100 dollars a month to those people who
are putting solar panels on their roof. When the voting took place they agreed
to charge a solar tax of 5 dollars a month, which is significant less to what
they had in mind. Also utilities companies and fossil fuel industries are
agreeing with these political leaders, and are trying to discourage the usage
of solar panels. Both of these industries are arguing that the increase of
usage of solar panel has put a strain on the power grid and can cause safety
problems. Another argument is that they believe people who implement solar
panels in their homes are stealing money because they are not paying the same
amount of money as everybody. Scientific research shows that solar panels are
not a safety hazard, and in my opinion using solar panels does not mean
stealing money because technology is accessible to anyone who wants to implement
it and it is not illegal.
What are the other side’s response? Of course they strongly
disagree as I do because they think this is the most efficient and cleanest way
to produce energy. People also believe using solar panels can prevent any type
of energy wars. Countries don’t have to fight over limited non-renewable
resources such as oil, and we can use the money we don’t spend in wars to
building technologies like solar panels.
David Leeper, an electrical engineer and a strong supporter
of usage of solar panels, heavily disagrees with the opposing argument. He
ridiculed the power industries argument and called the arguments a “high tech
chutzpah.” I fully agree with his arguments, especially when he states that he
is not a free loader and that he did not take any money from them. Mr. leeper
thinks that just because he is using an alternative source that is clean,
efficient and assessable to anyone doesn’t mean he is stealing from the power
companies. At first he strongly disagreed with the 100 dollar fee, but when it
was reduce to 5 dollars month he was satisfied with the outcome. He does not
oppose it because in the evenings or on cloudy days he will need power in his
home and he thinks is only fair to at least pay the fee in those specific
times.
Reference:
Schwartz, John. (2014). Fissures in G.O.P. as Some
Conservatives Embrace Renewable Energy. The New York Times. Retrieved from: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/26/us/politics/fissures-in-gop-as-some-conservatives-embrace-renewable-energy.html?_r=1
